Plain-English summary
What your architecture does end to end, translated from boxes-and-arrows into language you can carry into any conversation.
You've been handed a swimlane doc and an architecture diagram — neither written for testing. Answer a few questions and QualityAIQ matches your system to an industry-standard reference architecture, then derives the checkpoints, validation techniques, and risk-ranked test paths you'd otherwise rebuild by hand.
~2 minutes to a confirmed diagram
A real diagram from the tool, not a mockup — every zone, icon, and animated flow edge is generated the same way yours will be.
Match, checkpoints, risk-ranked progress, and a Jira-ready export — the short version. Prefer the interactive walkthrough? Watch the full demo →
How it works
Pick your industry and answer a few adaptive questions — no upload, no describing your real system.
Rename the generic diagram in your own vocabulary and lock it. That’s the whole editing step.
Checkpoints, prioritized paths, an execution plan, and a Jira-ready write-up — derived, not typed.
What your architecture does end to end, translated from boxes-and-arrows into language you can carry into any conversation.
The natural validation points in your flow, each with what "correct" looks like and how to actually check it.
Every path through the architecture, ranked — so you know which scenario to test first and why.
A stage-by-stage plan with entry/exit criteria per checkpoint, ready to structure your test cycle.
A condensed write-up formatted to paste into a ticket and feed your company’s AI test-case generator.
Track pass/fail per checkpoint per event type, and generate stakeholder-ready status views.
The Payload Chain Builder chains related documents — a PO, its ASN, its Invoice, or any multi-step sequence with server-generated cross-references — and regenerates a fresh, internally-consistent set in one click.
Most tools record what your app does today and warn you when that changes. This one works out what your app says it will do — the rules its own pages declare, plus researched rules for 16 enterprise systems (D365, SAP, Salesforce, Epic and more) — and checks it against them. Those checks have a known right answer, so they catch a rule the app has been breaking all along, not just a change.
It's in closed beta while we finish verifying site ownership for automation that clicks and submits on a live site, not just reads it. It opens up to all members once that's ready.
Learn more →A real browser walks the pages — signed in with a test account if you set one — recording the actual fields, their rules and each page’s API calls. Every exploration is kept and dated, so the model is a record of the app over time, not a pile of tests that quietly go stale.
Required fields, email formats, number limits and patterns become checks derived directly from what the app declares — no AI in the loop, and no assumption that today’s behaviour is correct.
Unless you declare a staging environment, any request that would change data is blocked in the browser before it leaves.
When a check fails, the scenario is re-planned against the page the run actually left behind and tried again. If it then passes, the test was wrong. If it still fails, that’s reported as a defect — never quietly “healed” until the run goes green.
A status report with red, amber or green per feature, exit criteria that say whether it’s good enough to ship, a test plan ordered by risk, and a Jira-ready defect for every confirmed failure.
Download any scenario, or all of them, as a standard Playwright test file for your own CI, or as a Cucumber feature file for Xray. Test logins are stored encrypted and never leave as values — the export reads them from environment variables.
A release lands that nobody told us about and quietly stops enforcing a rule. Watch it get caught, the right nine checks re-run, and a sign-off written — in about two minutes.
We ran 5,800 simulated questionnaire sessions — with realistic mistakes and skipped answers — through the matcher, then replaced its hand-tuned weights with a model trained on the results. Confidently-wrong matches dropped from 10.4% to 2.2%. It ran only on our own library, never on anything you type. How we did it →
A new integration-architecture pattern each month — how it works, what typically breaks, how to test it.
Tests catch what breaks, not what quietly disappears. Why that gap is growing as vendors ship every few weeks and AI wri…
Read →We benchmarked our own test-generation engine against a chat model given every page of the app — and lost, 3 seeded bugs…
Read →The fleet endpoint produces events whose correctness is nearly tautological: a device reports what it reports, and the i…
Read →Both are cheap to verify and both are misleading, because neither is where the claim's meaning is decided or where it ca…
Read →Both are cheap to assert and both are nearly useless as a measure of whether identity resolution works, because neither…
Read →The tempting places to point a tester are the ends of this chain: the wearable fleet, where the data is born, and the EH…
Read →Both are tempting because both are legible — you can see a request go out and a document come back, and you can assert o…
Read →The tempting places to aim test effort in this chain are the ends: the modality fleet, where pixels originate, and the W…
Read →The tempting places to test this flow are its ends: does the ordering EHR build a valid FHIR Claim, and does the schedul…
Read →You never upload a diagram or describe your real system. Instead, a few guided questions match you to the closest pattern in our library of generic, industry-standard reference architectures. You layer your own component names on top — those names stay in your session and are never used to grow the library. Every generated artifact reads in your vocabulary, built entirely from the generic pattern.
~2 minutes to a confirmed diagram, free, no account required until you want the deeper analysis.
Find my architecture →